Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Daredevils pacer Nannes out for a week with injury

NEW DELHI: Delhi Daredevils fast bowler Dirk Nannes missed Wednesday's game against Rajasthan Royals with a finger injury and has been ruled out for a week from the Indian Premier League (IPL).

The left-arm pacer sustained the injury after being hit by a scorching drive from Wriddhiman Saha in Daredevils' last game against Kolkata Knight Riders at the Ferozeshah Kotla Monday.

Nannes received stitches on the fingers and had to leave the field immediately without completing his over.

Nannes will surely miss the game against Royal Challengers Bangalore, April 4, but a top team official said that he would be fit for the away match against Kolkata Knight Riders April 7.

Delhi have already been hit by injuries to captain Gautam Gambhir, who had to sit out for three matches, while paceman Ashish Nehra is yet to play a game.
Source

Mumbai Indians bowlers can save Sachin from ban

Mumbai: Sachin Tendulkar is in danger of being suspended for a match. If the bowlers of Mumbai Indians, of which he is skipper, continue with their slow over rate in one more match, the Indian Premier League’s (IPL) premier batsman could pay for their action.
Tendulkar has been slapped with a fine of $40,000 for his team not completing their quota of overs in the stipulated time, in their match against Kings XI Punjab on Tuesday. It was the second such offence by the team. The third will result in the skipper’s suspension as per IPL rules.

“Since it was Mumbai Indians’ second offence of the season, under the IPL’s Code of Conduct relating to minimum over rate offences, captain Sachin Tendulkar was fined $40,000 and each player in the team $10,000,” an IPL release said on Wednesday.

At the end of Tuesday’s match, Mumbai Indians were assessed to be one over behind the required rate after allowances were taken into consideration. Each team is required to complete their 20 overs in 75 minutes.

As part of the IPL’s crackdown on slow over rates, one captain
has already had to face suspension. Kings XI Punjab skipper Kumar Sangakkara had to sit out of Tuesday’s match at the Brabourne because his side committed the offence thrice. Stand-in skipper Mahela Jayawardene has said the time allowed for 20 overs is not enough as too many things happen too fast during an innings.

Mumbai Indians’ next match is against the Deccan Chargers at the Brabourne stadium on Saturday.

Source


Younis can appeal against ban: PCB

The Pakistan Cricket Board says former test captain Younis Khan has the right to appeal against his indefinite ban from the national team.

PCB legal adviser Taffazul Rizvi said Tuesday that the cricket board had received a letter from Younis' lawyer seeking clarifications on the ban.

Rizvi said the PCB has responded by saying that the player can file an appeal to the tribunal.

The PCB banned Younis for an indefinite period due to indiscipline on the recommendation of an inquiry committee formed to investigate Pakistan's lopsided defeats in Australia earlier this year.


Source


Controversy shadows Shoaib-Sania wedding

LAHORE: The past has come to haunt former Pakistan captain Shoaib Malik soon after news about his engagement with Indian tennis star Sania Mirza. MA Siddiqui, father of Ayesha Siddiqui who was married to Shoiab via a telephonic nikah (marriage) in June 2002, has slammed the cricketer saying that Shoiab is still married to his daughter and that Sania would be his second wife not the first. MA Siddiqui has said he will take legal recourse and take Shoaib o court as he has wronged the Siddiqui family. “As per law, Ayesha will be the first wife and Sania will be second. I want divorce for my daughter. I will seek legal recourse. I will sue Shoiab because he has wronged us,” Siddiqui was quoted as saying on Wednesday.

Sania is surely on cloud nine, but the latest developments have come as a shocker for Shoaib’s ‘ex-wife’ Ayesha. The family is said to be in a state of shock and disbelief over the reports of Shoaib-Sania wedlock. Siddiqui, who has worked for the Saudi Airlines, claimed in February 2008 that Shoaib had married his daughter on June 3, 2002, through a telephone after a prolonged love affair on the Internet. But, the cricketer said he was only engaged to her and the marriage was called off because of problems between the families. But there is more to this affair.

Sources said Ayesha met Shoaib in a Dubai restaurant in 2001 along with her friend Maha. While Ayesha is a little plump, Maha was pretty and Shoaib fell for her. “On returning to Hyderabad, Ayesha posing as Maha started chatting with Shoaib,” sources said. Ayesha apparently fell in love with the cricketer and convinced her parents to contact his parents and arrange for a telephonic nikah. In 2005, when the Pakistan cricket team was in Hyderabad, the Siddiquis hosted a grand reception for them. “Shoaib became suspicious when he expressed his desire to meet Ayesha and her parents said she was out of town,” sources said.

Ayesha who was working as a school teacher in Dubai then reportedly sent her actual photograph to Shoaib. This apparently made the player snap all ties with her. He said the Siddiquis had cheated him. At a press conference in Lahore in January 2008, Shoaib’s brother-in-law Imran Malik said: “He wanted to marry Ayesha. But the photos Siddiqui showed him were not of his real daughter. They tried to commit fraud.” Siddiqui threatened to move the court and said Shoaib could not marry another girl without divorcing Ayesha. “But, with Shoaib threatening to press cheating charges against them, Ayesha’s family dropped the idea,” sources added.
Source

Chennai's three match-winners

The fringe player
In a team with stars like MS Dhoni and Matthew Hayden, left-arm spinner Shadab Jakati doesn't get top billing. Yet, in the three matches he has played this season, Jakati has provided Chennai with a failsafe run-saving option in the middle overs. This, in a team where six of the frontline bowlers tried this season have disappeared for eight runs per over or more. Jakati had success last season as well, taking eight wickets in his first two IPL games, but offspinner R Ashwin was favoured at the start of this campaign. After Ashwin was offcolour for three matches in a row, Jakati got his chance and he has been spot-on since.

Today, Jakati continued with his round-the-wicket, keep-it-full policy and it paid off; first, he had the in-form Robin Uthappa, holing out to midwicket, to put the skids on Bangalore Royal Challengers after they had blasted Manpreet Gony for 19 in an over. Two more tight overs followed, but he saved his best for when he returned with Bangalore again looking ominous. The rock-steady Jacques Kallis had guided them to 115 for 2 in 15 overs and a final onslaught loomed, but Jakati had Virat Kohli swatting a full toss to long-on first ball, before Kallis was run-out two deliveries later. Kevin Pietersen, playing his first match this season, watchfully saw out three remaining balls of the over, which meant Jakati had bowled what was Chennai's second maiden of the competition. At 29, Jakati already has more than a decade's worth of domestic experience and little recognition, but more IPL matches like this should change that, and make him a rich man after the next auction.

Knocking on the international door
Unlike many of India's talented youngsters, M Vijay got his first taste of international action in Test cricket rather than in the limited-overs formats. Seen as someone with a game suited for the long form, he did little of note when given chances in the IPL last season in South Africa. This year also got off to a disappointing start, with several single-digit scores, but in the last couple of matches Vijay has reeled off two of his best Twenty20 innings.

Chennai have often looked to Hayden to provide the propulsion at the top of the order, but Vijay has shared that load in the previous two games. Against Rajasthan Royals on Sunday, his savage assault on medium-pacer Sumit Narwal - three fours and two sixes in a single over - kept Chennai in the chase, though the team lost due to a middle-order muddle.

Against Bangalore, he brought up his first IPL half-century - a blistering leg-side-heavy innings - after which Chennai should have sauntered to victory. All six shots which cleared the rope in his 78 were on the on-side (only 12 off-side runs in his innings), peppering the entire arc from fine leg to long-on. The barrage started in the fourth over, when Vijay crashed three sixes on his way to taking 24 off Praveen Kumar. At that stage, he was outscoring Hayden 37 to 0. The rest of his sixes were saved for the part-time offspin of Kevin Pietersen, and by the time he was dismissed looking for his third hit into the stands beyond long-on in the 11th over, Chennai were left needing little more than a-run-ball with plenty of wickets in the tank.

The legend
In the inaugural season of the IPL, Muttiah Muralitharan was introduced to the harsh realities of Twnety20 when he was axed from a team for the first time in at least a decade; that too after he turned in impeccable figures of 4-0-12-0. Since then, though, Chennai have realised his worth, and rarely kept him out of the XI despite their preference for overseas players with all-round skills.

He is Chennai's MVP of the season so far. In a team of spendthrift bowlers, Murali has been consistently miserly - giving away just 6.15 runs an over. He is the only Chennai bowler to complete his full quota in every game this season, another indicator of his lack of off-days. Add to this the Purple Cap for being the leading wicket-taker in the tournament, and it's easy to see why he's the first name on the team-sheet for every match.

While his outstanding success in the game's more conventional forms has had plenty to do with his prodigious ability to turn the ball, his Twenty20 mastery has less to do with his spinning the ball sharply. He prefers to bowl round-the-wicket, keeps attacking the stumps to deny the batsman any room and maintains a full length to restrict the chances of the batsman muscling the ball down the ground. That nagging accuracy worked well against Bangalore, choking the batting and allowing only singles. On a day when he finished with 4-0-21-0, his best over was the 15th, when a well-set Kallis couldn't even get bat on ball on four deliveries and Bangalore only got two runs at a time when they were looking to hit top gear.

Source


Afridi writes to PCB; requests reconsideration of fine

Shahid Afridi has written to the PCB chairman asking him to reconsider the fine imposed on him by a committee for ball-tampering during the fifth ODI against Australia in February this year. Though local reports suggested that the fine will be withdrawn, the board says it has asked Afridi to formally appeal against the charge.

Afridi was fined Rs. 3 million ($35,000) and put on probation for a six-month period after the committee, set up after a disastrous tour of Australia, found him guilty of bringing the game and country into disrepute. Afridi was caught on TV biting the ball in a bid to tamper with it. He was leading Pakistan in the match and was immediately banned for two games, by the ICC.

He was temporarily removed as Pakistan's Twenty20 captain following the incident but was announced recently by the board as the man to lead Pakistan's defense in the World Twenty20, due to begin in the Caribbean on April 30th. Afridi's personal plea to the chairman is based on the grounds that he has already been punished once for the incident, and a fine would be the second punishment for the same offence. "Afridi has written a letter to us and we will consider it in due course," Ijaz Butt, the PCB chairman, told Cricinfo. "His punishment has not been withdrawn yet and all these reports are baseless."

The letter does not, however, constitute a formal appeal and Afridi is likely to be told he should follow the process set up by the board to the punished players. Seven players were punished in all by the committee with fines and bans - the Akmal brothers, Shoaib Malik, Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, Mohammad Yousuf, Younis Khan and Afridi - though the specific nature of charges was never released. The board has set up a three-member appeals panel consisting of retired judges from the Supreme and High Courts and given the players 30 days to file appeals.

As of today, no player has filed an official appeal. Afridi has sent a letter to the chairman, as has Younis Khan who has been banned indefinitely from playing from Pakistan. The board has sent Younis a reply asking him to initiate a formal appeal to the panel. Rana, banned for a year from playing for Pakistan for unspecified offences, has today also sent in a legal notice through his lawyer to the PCB in which some legal objections have been raised about his punishment, but this is not a formal appeal.

Malik, also banned for a year, said he intends to appeal but he's currently playing in a Twenty20 tournament in Sharjah - he could lodge an appeal upon his return - and is possibly distracted by the announcement of his wedding to Indian tennis star Sania Mirza.

Yousuf, meanwhile, has announced his retirement from international cricket as a result of his indefinite ban though he also said recently he might consider appealing should he be advised to do so.

Source


Monday, March 29, 2010

Warner played a blinder: Ganguly, Gambhir

On a slow pitch, where 150 was the par score, both Sourav Ganguly and Gautam Gambhir agreed that David Warner's blistering century made the difference between the two sides.

Ganguly said that it was a good toss for Delhi Daredevils skipper Gautam Gambhir to win, and praised Warner's innings.

"I thought they batted very well," Ganguly said. "It was a good toss to win on this pitch, and then David played a blinder. It was a 150-runs wicket, but the way he batted even after they were 38/3 just took the game away from us. We had got those early wickets, but he still kept clearing the ground."

Ganguly said that the pitch was slow and the ball gripped the surface, which was a factor in his decision to use more spinners.

"It was a slow pitch - it gripped and turned. Also, the seamers were going for runs, so spin was the only option.

"I think we need to bat better. Unfortunately, the toss was important on two wickets - in Ahmedabad and here, and we lost both tosses. However, you cannot control the toss, but we can improve our bowling and batting. The fielding has been good overall."

Gautam Gambhir, who was back as skipper after missing four matches, said that given the nature of the track, Warner's innings was amongst the best he had seen.

"Warner's innings was one of the best I've ever seen, especially since it was this kind of a track. He played some incredible shots and set the momentum for us. That's the way he always plays, and that's the way we want him to play. That is what makes guys like him and Viru such great match-winners and we want to give them all the freedom to just go out there and play their natural games."

On being asked whether he had any words of advice or caution for Warner during the strategy break, Gambhir chuckled, "Do you think he would have listened to me?"

On a more serious note, Gambhir said that his side had an advantage as they knew how to bowl on the kind of wicket that the Kotla had.

"An important thing is that we know how to bowl on this kind of a track, we know how to mix it up. It will always be difficult to adjust to this kind of track for a team that's coming here."

Gambhir also had words of praise for young pacer Umesh Yadav.

"Umesh Yadav is one to look out for in the future. He's got good pace. He's got all the qualities for becoming a very good fast bowler, and if he keeps working hard, we'll definitely have someone who can bowl at 145-150 kmph."

Warner paid tribute to his batting partner Collingwood, and said that he had just played his natural game.

"I knew I had to assess the conditions and just back myself. That's just the way I play my game. We knew that to put up a good total on the board, batting first was the best time to bat.

"Paul Collingwood was perfect. It's his debut and he assessed the conditions well. We knew we had to have a big partnership after the loss of early wickets and that's what we did. We now have two wins in a row and we'll look to take that momentum into the next game."
Source

One of Pakistan's finest middle-order batsmen

Mohammad Yousuf will be remembered for his unhurried elegance and grace at the crease as much as for the runs he scored, but over his 12-year career he built up pretty imposing numbers as well. With a Test tally of 7431 runs, he is third in the all-time list for Pakistan, next only to Javed Miandad and Inzamam-ul-Haq. In ODIs he is in second place with 9458 runs, behind Inzamam.

Yousuf scored only six runs in two innings in his debut Test, and in his first year, his four fifties and maiden century all came against Zimbabwe. Over the first three years of his international career he had his moments, but lack of consistency meant his average just about touched 40 after his first 27 Tests.

The graph started going up in 2001, when a maiden double-century against New Zealand in Christchurch was followed by a century and another double against Bangladesh early the next year. Over the next six years beginning 2001, he had a golden run in which he scored 18 centuries in 46 Tests, including nine during an unbelievable 2006, a year in which he scored 1788 runs in 11 Tests, which remains the most by a batsman in a single calendar year.

For more Read it here


Thank god it's Yousuf

We had all of us, fans, writers, followers, invested heavy faith in Yousuf Youhana. Time had finally succeeded in its almighty chase of Javed Miandad, scandal had done for Saleem Malik. Inzamam-ul-Haq stood stout, but Pakistan's batting tale in the 1990s was essentially a struggle against poverty, of one man scraping, clawing his way out, the rest riding pillion. Youhana represented a slip of hope, and as the century turned, with twin hundreds in the Caribbean and at home against England, faith was paying back. Yet as 2005 approached its close, faith was slipping.

It wasn't just what the numbers told us, for they were as they always are, to be interpreted according to need. Four thousand runs, an average flirting 48, and 13 centuries told us one thing, but one second-innings hundred, four match-winning ones, and an average of 32.60 against India, Australia, South Africa, England, and Sri Lanka told us quite another.

More gnawing was the idea, freely floated, that when there was strife - which was often - Youhana wasn't around. Inzamam's outstanding record in this strange, intangible category made it worse. One journalist carried with him a list of all Youhana's failures in ODI chases, a kind of balance book of sin. It became a Salem witch-hunt: every failure was damning, and sometimes even success was, like a Multan hundred against India. A dreamy MCG hundred, or one in Kolkata, was begrudgingly excused, belittled even, as the requisite one-off: "I mean, he does have some talent."

Then in September 2005, Yousuf Youhana discovered faith. Another one. Soon we began to rediscover ours too.

***

In the lobby of Lahore's glitziest five-star hotel, Mohammad Yousuf cuts a jarring figure. Here even the walls drip wealth, and art isn't priceless, only six figures away. The women are bejewelled, bedecked, and bewitching. The men are suits or sherwanis, and even hotel staff carry on with the authority of those being served rather than serving. Yes, here in a simple stone-grey and white shalwar kameez, Yousuf's is a humbler, unadorned presence.

As we walk to the coffee shop, he with the shoulders-drooping, languid but confident gait of an athlete who has done good for the day, two fans approach. One chides him affectionately: "You're always praying before every ball. Why not pray for us as well?"

"Looks like, Yousuf bhai, that Gray-Nicholls has done something to you," the other smiles eagerly.

"It's all upstairs, everything comes from upstairs," Yousuf responds. "Nothing is done down here; it is all decided and done up there." He points to a magnificently gaudy, oversized crystal chandelier. Beyond that, he means, beyond the top floor, beyond the smoggy skies of Lahore, beyond the great beyond.

Allah is top of his mind. It's been just over a year since he made public his change of faith, from Christianity to Islam. The sign of the cross, with which he used to greet landmarks, stands replaced by the sajda, and the first time it happened, a sizeable crowd went wild. A pretty picture it made too, the front pages of most dailies carrying it the next day.

Much has changed since then, not least his willingness to talk. Then, as England arrived and the conversion presented itself as an ideal feature, Yousuf sidestepped the subject. He told The Guardian before an interview, "The one thing I will tell you straightaway is that I am not talking about religion in this series. I am totally focused on my game."

Understandably so, for at the time it was an uncomfortable thing. Personal battles were being fought: his family, especially his mother, fumed, blaming Saeed Anwar for "ruining her son's life", and publicly announced: "I don't want to give Yousuf my name after what he has done."

There was tetchiness too about when he had decided to become a Muslim. In an interview that he had given, to The Daily Telegraph, it was said he had converted in 2001 and had told his team-mates on the 2004-05 tour to Australia. Salman Butt, translating for him, expressed surprise at finding out on the tour. Rumours circulated that he had converted during the 2003 World Cup. Maybe it's not important. When he did go public is when, we assume, he was comfortable with it, had come to terms with it.

Broader battles also raged beyond him: the treatment of religious minorities, of whom Christians make up between 1.5 and two per cent, in the Islamic Republic has been the subject of permanent, anguished debate. He was a leading Christian, and it had meant a lot to many. It proved and disproved things: we are a tolerant nation, it said, not multicultural but tolerant. It disproved that minorities couldn't do well. He captained the country, the team ate Christmas dinners with him.

Pakistan is also uniquely situated, geographically a leading ally in a war against terror, spiritually a destination for terrorists. The MMA (a political conglomerate of Islamic parties, extreme and moderate) sits in government in two provinces, forever a reminder of a creeping lurch towards something beyond an Islamic republic even, something darker, incurably obscurantist. Now, though, Allah is on his mind. The conversation begins disjointed; I talk batting, he skirts it. I bring up the Boxing Day hundred in Australia, an innings of more meaning than many of his had had till then. It was a fascinating knock, the best of what Yousuf Youhana was as batsman. He was captaining his second Test, the only Christian to lead his country. On Boxing Day, against the game's best attack.

"My best hundred, because they are a complete team. Scoring against [Glenn] McGrath and [Shane] Warne is the ultimate. We had that Test in our grasp and it was a shame we lost in the end," he starts.

On delving, he adds, "You see the thing is that if any human thinks he's responsible for what is happening, then he's wrong. Everything happens upstairs, none here. If we were responsible for it all, then everyone would be scoring a hundred every game."

He's building up to it, I think, the clincher, that piece of faultless logic which justifies, explains All. "Tell me, if it was under my control, would I have gotten out for 192 today, that close to a double? I always want to make a double, but it's not in my hand." There it is.

Almost taunting, I ask, "So why go out to bat at all? Go out there with a stick - let Him do it for you."

"Are you making fun?"

"No, I'm just asking."

"This is not in the hands of people. This is my belief. Anyone else, I can't say."

And yet.

***

And yet, he is not so uncaring when it comes to worldly matters, such as his game, his position, his form, what others think. Actually he can be surprisingly pernickety. The subject of his career pre-Mohammad is broached, in particular the criticism most often flung his way, that he's pretty as a peacock, and as useful as one in a dogfight.

Immediately he warms up. "My average in Tests and ODIs has always been good. Since I started playing ODIs, my average has been the best in Pakistan. No one has come near me. In Tests there is only Inzamam above me. So where have I played badly? Will someone please explain? One, two poor series anyone can have, or a poor match. If you fail continuously, your average cannot remain the same. It will drop.

"The real problem here is not that there is so much criticism. It is that we fail to appreciate good things. Don't appreciate me, I am saying, but look at what we did with Wasim Akram. Has there been a player like him in the game? And look at how he is treated. See, here everyone thinks they are the hero, but few people actually think it after having done something, like Wasim bhai. That is the masla."

He is also not as modest as I was led to believe. Friends, journalists, fans around him, warned me from the off about his humility. I didn't, then, expect this: "It isn't just the best form of my career. I think few have had such great form ever." A brief pause later, he adds, "In Pakistan."

Mind you, he's rightfully proud, breaking records, in the form of his life, Pakistan's best batsman. He just knows it, and reels off numbers. "See, this year we have 12 Tests, which is the most for ages. Even then I missed one. In nine Tests so far, I have made 1315 runs. I am the first Pakistani to have 901 points in ICC rankings, just behind [Ricky] Ponting. Even Sachin [Tendulkar] hasn't made that many points."

Something has clicked; one penny somewhere, somehow has dropped. Even if we pretend he has prospered on flat tracks, against weak attacks, his hunger has been phenomenal. As if, to be cute, he's fasted through his career and the last year was Eid, when he stuffed himself silly.

The pitches, the series against India excepted, weren't deader than the global norm, nor the bowlers clowns. Above all, his arrival was, generally, with the team on the brink of disaster: openers gone, barely a run on the board. His Lord's double, such artistry, should've been blue-collar work, for it came after 28 for 2 became 68 for 4. At Leeds, 36 for 2 conceived 192; at the Oval 70 for 1 (and an opener injured) helped make 128. Even against West Indies over winter, he rarely had the comforts of a platform; he made 192 at Lahore from 45 for 2. At Multan, where he made 191, he came in at 124 for 2, which sounds pleasant but hides a deficit of 234. Or rather, he didn't, He did.

"I said it after Lord's," he explains. "Since I started coming forward, praying five times a day, I have gained much in the way of discipline, focus. Whoever prays five times daily and prays Fajr [dawn prayers], Allah will take responsibility for all his actions and work. We have no work here.

"I have matured and aged. But really, Allah has brought all this. Training, practice are all fine and well, it makes a little difference, but this performance only Allah can bring about."

***

Thirty-one years and 24 days before Mohammad Yousuf was born, Youhana Masih and his wife had a boy, Yousuf, in Lahore's Railway Colony. The father worked at the railway station; the family, like many Pakistani Christians (many of whom converted from Hindu untouchables in the 19th century) was mired in poverty.

Cricket was a distraction, at best a way out, and certainly no obsession. "The height of my ambition was to play well enough to get a job, with WAPDA [Water and Power Development Authority] or PIA [Pakistan International Airlines]."

It wasn't leather and willow either. "We used a table tennis ball, taped up, with my brother bowling."

"Table tennis or tennis?" I ask, bemused.

"Table tennis. We couldn't afford tennis balls."

The bat was a plank of wood, bringing but a whiff of Don Bradman's stump and golf ball tale but no more. Golden Gymkhana, a local club, spotted Youhana, beginning a formal induction into the game. He joined the famed Forman Christian College and continued playing until he suddenly gave it up in 1994 for nearly a year. A steady income was the hour's need. About to join a tailor's, he was pulled back. A local club was short, they called him in to make up the numbers, he made a hundred. An encounter in the course of the match led to a league season in Yorkshire, and a path back.

A year later, a first-class debut beckoned. Lahore ignored him, for "political reasons", he says suggestively. Undaunted, he trooped to nearby Bahawalpur, and in October 1996 made 46 on debut. A heavy-scoring second season aroused interest, and in February 1998, against South Africa, he became the fourth Christian to represent Pakistan. "I had no idea. I don't want to say I was a good player or anything. It all happened because of Allah - humans have nothing to do with it. I had no aim to play for Pakistan."

Five and one on Test debut reinforced the limited ambition in his mind: "I had no idea what hit me initially. I was disheartened, but Rashid Latif insisted that he will give me a chance. And we had Zimbabwe to follow. It was kismat - Allah helped me make three fifties there and that was it." It was only a year later, however, on the Australia tour where a brace of fifties made him realise, "I can play this game quite well."

***

After the World Cup this year, I met the journalist who carried Yousuf's failings with him. He had begun to brandish it again. "What did he do at the World Cup or in South Africa?"

He "did" a twinkling Test 83 and a lovely ODI hundred, but little besides. In the World Cup, he was the middle in a middle-order trio that mustered 166 runs between them: Yousuf made 18 runs more than Younis, 19 fewer than the captain. Average-wise, he was six points above Younis, six below Inzamam. Middling in a disaster: questions resurfaced.

Thing is, this business of faith is a fickle one. People change it, lose it, abuse it when they need it, ignore it when they don't. Where faith was, 18 months ago, a cause for uniting a disparate bunch, it is now a distraction, a factor in failure. Yousuf was the bearded poster boy; but the hirsuteness is now thought to have gone against him when picking a captain.

A new light is upon Yousuf now. Inzamam is gone, Younis disaffected; only Yousuf stands. "Whatever happens in the world," he ends, "whatever has happened, whatever will happen, happens under His will." Faith has been tested till now. Likely, it will be tested more hereafter.

Source


A sense of non-retirement

Not once in his scripted spiel did Mohammad Yousuf actually say anything about quitting international cricket, which, given that the occasion was to officially announce his retirement, seemed a strange way of going about it. Having already told the biggest, most influential Urdu-language paper in the country two days ago that he was going to retire - essentially the whole country - perhaps he felt he didn't need to say he was actually retiring at the function organised for that very purpose.

It was only after he finished thanking past captains, players, God, and talking about a PCB letter, that a bemused reporter asked him, just to be sure, "So you are retiring right?"

"Yes, yes," Yousuf quickly responded. "Yes, this is my retirement. I have retired from international cricket." The whole affair has about it the permanence of an ice cube in the Sahara.

Reluctantly, Yousuf answered questions, which weren't really answers at all.

'Why are you retiring?'

"After the Australia tour I got a letter from the PCB which said that me staying in the team is harmful to the team and Pakistan cricket," he answered. "I don't want to cause harm to Pakistan cricket. Everyone has their own thinking and the disciplinary committee has its own thinking and I haven't understood the reasons for it, or senior players, or the public."

'Is this a final decision?' asked another.

"Filhaal, this is what I can see, that my playing for Pakistan is damaging."

Filhaal means, essentially, 'for now.' Four times over the next 15 minutes, as he was asked variants of the same question - if there is a change in administration will you come back, if captain, coach, PCB, selector call will you come back, if the public want you back, will you come back? - he said the same thing: "For now, this is it, for now this is my retirement."

For now: so here we had retirement as a temporary state of being. Heavyweight boxers have sounded more serious about farewells. Some time into it, journalists started taking bets as to when they'll be here again covering the return of Yousuf. One even went and told Yousuf he better book the Press Club now for whenever he announces his return, so busy can the calendar get. The response, other than a smile, wasn't recorded.

Yousuf was asked whether he will now appeal against the indefinite ban imposed on him by the PCB, and if it seemed an irrelevant question, it gained significance with the answer. "Retirement I have given but as far as the appeal is concerned I will speak to my elders and if they allow me to, I will appeal." So if the elders approve - the very same who advised him to retire - Yousuf will appeal to have an indefinite ban lifted so that he can what? Stay retired? He'll even continue playing first-class and league cricket, "to stay in touch and keep my fitness."

Even the whole function at the Karachi Press Club was decidedly non-retirement in spirit. It could have been a belated meet for his feats of 2006, the year of Yousuf. Press club officials made impassioned speeches about his greatness and gave him gifts before he finally came on to speak, like a homecoming hero and not, as is the case, a departing one.

He didn't moan openly about the PCB, insisting that because the letter said he would be harmful to the team, he will not play for the team. So, came the assumption, you agree you were harmful to the team? "What the PCB is saying that is what they are saying," he didn't explain. "I don't have answers to what you guys are asking."

Finally, when everyone reluctantly decided that this is actually a farewell press conference and not the kind of pressure tactic everyone suspected it to be, someone asked him, half-heartedly, to recall his most memorable performances. Usually it is the first question in such situations. "I always tried for Pakistan to benefit from my batting and if people feel that, then I am happy. Any innings through which I saved Pakistan or won a Test, I am most satisfied with."

It might be final, it might not. Presumably, Yousuf will surely tell us, it is not in any mortal's hands. If it is to be - and the PCB so far seems monumentally unconcerned - then Yousuf leaves behind a comprehensive body of work, though not perhaps unadulterated acclaim.

Undoubtedly, he was Pakistan's best batsman behind Inzamam-ul-Haq this decade and that he was so good to watch was, in these overcoached times of the stiff elbow, sweet mercy. But an ordinary record against Australia and South Africa will hound him forever (though the beauty of an MCG, Boxing Day special against Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath can never be erased).

After his record year, he never kicked on, mired in petty distractions. And it is strangely fitting that of his 24 Test hundreds, eight were in Pakistan wins, eight in draws and eight in losses; enough ammunition for those who think he didn't win too many games for Pakistan and just as much for those who think he saved them sufficient times and for there never to be a completely clear verdict.

But one day, when all is finally said and done, we will perhaps remember him for his quite extraordinary story. His rise to where he is, to the captain of Pakistan, to become one of their best batsmen ever, is a singularly heartening tale of how sometimes, somehow, talent alone is enough to overcome just about anything. It is testament to a spirit; a spirit that should never die in this land.

If only so that he can go out with the grace that his batting deserves, it is hoped this is not final.

Source


Sunday, March 28, 2010

Mohammad Yousuf set to retire

Mohammad Yousuf is preparing to retire from all forms of international cricket, a direct result it is believed, of the treatment and punishment the PCB handed out to him in the aftermath of Pakistan's recent Australian tour of which he was captain.

Yousuf was handed an indefinite ban as per the recommendations of an inquiry committee set up by the board to investigate why Pakistan lost every single one of the nine international matches in Australia over the turn of the year. Seven of those losses - three in Tests and four in ODIs - came under the leadership of Yousuf.

In their findings, the board blamed Yousuf for spreading infighting and indiscipline within the side and banned him for an indefinite period - along with Younis Khan - from all forms of the international game. He was subsequently not included in the central contracts list for this year.

Yousuf had taken over the captaincy last year when Younis stepped down following an ODI series loss to New Zealand in Abu Dhabi, at a time he says no one was willing to take the responsibility. Though he hasn't yet specified the reasons behind his decision, it is believed that the PCB's punishment and a lack of support from the board have made his mind up for him. Those close to him say that constant run-ins with the board have diminished his appetite to stay on.

"I have decided to quit cricket," Yousuf told the Urdu-language daily Jang. "This is not an emotional decision. I consulted my family, friends and elders before taking it."

In the past Yousuf has twice bid farewell to Pakistan cricket, after being upset over his treatment from Pakistan's selectors and management. In 2007, after being overlooked for Pakistan's World Twenty20 squad, he signed up with the ICL in protest. Though he was convinced to come back into the fold by the PCB - and paid handsomely to do so - he ultimately joined the league again in 2008. Both times he was barred from playing for Pakistan.

Underlining his decision each time was a strained relationship with the then captain Shoaib Malik. Yousuf publicly accused Malik of destroying his career and though he returned to the national team as Malik was deposed as captain, the pair have been involved in a public slanging match again after the Australian tour. Yousuf is scheduled to hold a press conference on Monday in Karachi to make the decision official and is expected to outline the reasons for his retirement.

If it is the final goodbye - and his current mood, say friends, indicates that he is serious - then Pakistan will lose the services of their most accomplished batsman of the decade alongside Inzamam-ul-Haq. He has over seven thousand Test runs from 88 Tests at 53.07, the highest for any Pakistani batsman. He has 39 international hundreds, including 24 in Tests alone. Pakistan are due to play six Tests in England this summer, a prospect they must now consider - if Younis also misses out - without either of their most formidable middle-order batsmen.

Source


Mohammad Yousuf should not retire - Shahid Afridi

Shahid Afridi, Pakistan's captain for the upcoming ICC World Twenty20, has called on Mohammad Yousuf to reconsider his decision to retire from international cricket. Yousuf, banned indefinitely by the PCB in the aftermath of a disastrous tour of Australia, is expected to make a formal announcement on Monday.

"I think Yousuf is taking an emotional decision, but I think he must reconsider his decision because he still has a lot to give to Pakistan cricket," Afridi was quoted as saying by PTI. "Yousuf I think has been affected by the recent happenings and is upset with the ban on him, but he is a senior player and he must handle the situation. He must not take an emotional decision.

"We have a lot of Test matches coming up in next 10 to 12 months and we need his experience against the top teams like Australia, England, South Africa and New Zealand."

Yousuf has over seven thousand Test runs from 88 Tests at 53.07, the highest for any Pakistani batsman. He has 39 international hundreds, including 24 in Tests alone

Yousuf was among seven Pakistan players penalised, for various reasons after a winless tour of Australia. Younis Khan and Yousuf were banned indefinitely for "infighting" and "attitude" that, the PCB said, was a "bad influence" on the team. Shoaib Malik and Rana Naved-ul-Hasan were handed one-year bans, while Shahid Afridi and the Akmal brothers were fined and placed on probation for six months.

Source


Harbhajan outguns old rival Symonds

Harbhajan Singh showed off his all-round ability with a match-winning performance to lead Mumbai to a 41-run triumph over the Deccan Chargers in the Indian Premier League overnight.

Harbhajan bashed 49 not out from just 18 balls to help the Indians post a target of 7 for 172 after his side was struggling at 7 for 119 with just three overs left.

The fiery customer even re-ignited his battle with foe Andrew Symonds, smashing the Australian for a four and six before taking 19 runs off the next over bowled by Kemar Roach.

The Indian spinner returned shortly after to open the bowling and remove dangerous Chargers captain Adam Gilchrist with the second ball of the innings.

Harbhajan finished with figures of 3 for 31 from four overs.

Rohit Sharma provided the only resistance from there with a well-made 45 from 28 balls.

Symonds scored only 1 as the Chargers were bowled out for 131 with just over two overs remaining.

Sachin Tendulkar hit 55 for Mumbai to continue his irrepressible form and notch his fourth half century of the tournament from six innings.

Mumbai is now top of the IPL with a 5-1 record, while Gilchrist's Deccan is 3-3 and battling to make the finals.

Source


Thursday, March 25, 2010

Old Masters

In the preview of the match between Chennai and Mumbai, I had written that the showpiece of the match would be the Tendulkar versus Murali battle, but it would be equally fascinating to see how the other batsmen in the Mumbai line-up coped with Murali.

While Murali was superb against other batsmen, in the battle of the old masters, there was only one winner. And as it turned out, the man to win the mini-battle also ensured that his side ended up as the winning side.

Taken in isolation, Tendulkar scored 72 off 52 balls, a very good Twenty20 innings by itself, while Murali returned figures of 2/32 off 4 overs - an average return. However, further digging into the figures reveals a better picture. While Tendulkar batted, he faced 12 balls off Murali. Off those 12, Tendulkar took Murali for 18 runs, including a delightful little shimmy down the track for his first six of the IPL.

That, however meant that to the rest of the Mumbai batsmen, Murali returned figures of 2-0-14-2. These included the freak six that Kieron Pollard hit, with a mere flick of his wrists that sailed over the long on boundary. Without that shot, Murali bowled 1.5 overs for returns of 2/8 - excellent for Twenty20 cricket.

However, the difference was that while he managed to keep other batsmen quiet, he could not tame Tendulkar. Even at the start of his innings, when Tendulkar was not timing the ball as fluently as he does, and as delightfully as was during this IPL, the bowling Master could not breach the defences of the batting Master.

In fact, it was in Murali's third over - the 13th of the innings - when Tendulkar found his batting rhythm again. Like all champions, he chose his man and his moment with impeccable timing. Till then, Mumbai were 106/2 after 12 overs, scoring at slightly less than the required rate, with Shikhar Dhawan having done the bulk of the damage. Tendulkar was batting on 30 off 28 balls - a low strike rate by his standards, by the standards of Twenty20 cricket, and by the standards of the chase Mumbai were attempting, which was of a sizeable 180+ target.

However, that was the over in which Tendulkar hit Murali for six, and since that over he scored 42 runs off the next 24 balls - a run-rate of 10.50 runs per over and well above what Mumbai required.

That was the mark of the champion in Tendulkar. He had kept his score ticking even when he was struggling, knowing that if he hung in long enough, he would break free, and when he broke free, Mumbai would be home.

And so once again, it is Tendulkar who is showing the way in Twenty20 cricket. What was supposed to be a slog-fest of young legs, short boundaries and dead pitches, has been elevated by the art of his batting. He has shown that it is possible to score big and score quickly by hitting cultured shots. He has shown that given enough mastery over the format, it is possible to pace one's innings in the small space that Twenty20 cricket also provides. And most importantly, whenever he has batted in the IPL, he has brought the focus sharply back on the cricket that is being played, allowing fans to forget that commentators have become soap salesmen for various brands, and that anchors on television often leave you feeling as if you'd like to throw the nearest thing at hand on them.

In passing, it was ironical that for the supposedly 'young man's' game that Twenty20 is, the outcome of a high-profile, high-scoring match, should have hinged on who won the battle between two champions, both on the wrong side of 35.
Source

I've never taken anything for granted in cricket: Tendulkar

Chennai Super Kings captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni was disappointed at his team's defeat to the Mumbai Indians, but was at a loss to explain the failure of his bowlers to contain the Mumbai batting line-up. While conceding that batting was Chennai's strength, Dhoni said that the bowlers needed to build more confidence.

"Batting is our strength, but you can't really score 200 everytime," Dhoni said. "I think our bowlers are lacking confidence. When they bowl in the practice sessions, our batsmen find them very difficult to score off - and we have some of the best hitters in the game. But when it comes to the match, I think the pressure gets to them. I think its just about being confident and believing in themselves. We need to lift our bowling department a bit."

Dhoni praised Suresh Raina, who played a brilliant innings of 83 not out off 52 balls. During the course of his innings, Raina became the highest scorer in the IPL for Chennai overall, becoming the first person from Chennai to cross 1000 runs.

"I am happy with the way Suresh Raina batted. He is our strength. Matthew Hayden at the top of the order looks to dominate from the first delivery, and whenever we've gotten off to a good start, Raina is one batsman who has capitalized on it. He has more than 1000 runs in the IPL, so that itself shows how well he has done."

Dhoni said that he thought 180 was a good score to get, and didn't blame his batsmen, in spite of a couple of quiet overs when Raina and Badrinath (who made 55 not out off 45) were batting.

"I think the batsmen tried their best. I know that in the middle, Malinga bowled really well, giving away just 6 runs which is very difficult when the batsmen are set. They bowled well in a couple of overs, but we got 180-odd runs. You can always say that 190 would have been a better score, but there was still one over left when they [Mumbai] won."

Dhoni was lavish in his praise for his counterpart, Sachin Tendulkar, who played a match-winning innings of 72 off 52 balls for Mumbai.

"I think there's plenty for youngsters to learn from Tendulkar's batting. He saw the size of the field, he knew every fielder who had a weak shoulder, and amazingly, throughout the innings he used the bowler really well. Whether you are a bowler or a batsman, there is plenty to learn from Sachin Tendulkar."

Tendulkar himself was as modest as ever in victory, as he earned yet another man-of-the-match award for taking his team home. He praised Shikhar Dhawan who did the initial quick scoring, and ended up making 56 off 34 balls.

"It's a wonderful moment for us. This was a big game and we had to chase a big total. In the last match we got off to a flier, scoring 26 runs in 2 overs, but today that wasn't the case. However, Shikhar accelerated brilliantly and played some big shots, hit some sixes. And then there were short partnerships that kept the run-rate going. It was nicely calculated, so I'm quite happy that in the end we've won."

When asked if he was struggling a little at the start of his innings, when he didn't seem to be batting as fluently as he did later, Tendulkar said, "I saw the total was 180-plus and I just tried to force the pace a bit too much. Then I just decided that it is important for me to play out the full 20 overs, and let players take chances from the other end. It was important that I controlled the match, and I did that."

Tendulkar re-iterated his stance of not playing Twenty20 Internationals, saying that he had made it very clear in 2007 itself.

"I'm enjoying playing the IPL Twenty20. As for International Twenty20, I sort of said in 2007 itself thank you very much to International Twenty20. I've been involved in the IPL since the beginning, however, and it's fun.

"I wanted to finish the game, but it was unfortunate that I got out playing the pull shot. But Bravo finished it very well, and I'm happy that we've won."

Tendulkar didn't blame his bowlers for conceding a large score to Chennai.

"I don't think 180 was too much, because even Chennai have some great names and they've come here to win as well. So it's always going to be competitive.

"Our bowlers tried hard, but occasionally I thought we were not able to hit the right areas, which is part and parcel of the game. Credit to Raina, I thought he really played some good shots, and Badrinath played a good supporting role.

"Pollard's flick of the wrist for six (off Muralitharan) was very good. He's shaping up well. It's his first time here in the IPL, so I'm sure in time to come, you're going to see some big shots."

Tendulkar said it was too early to think of the semi-finals, even though his team had a good run so far, and he didn't want to take anything for granted.

"It's too early to think of the semi-finals. There's still a long way in the tournament. We don't want to take things for granted - I've never done that in cricket. It's a funny old game, the moment you feel that everything is in the right place, things start to go wrong. We don't want to be on the back-foot, we want to be on our toes."
Source

Overlords, seducers, associates

Was it really the captaincy of Shane Warne that drove the Rajasthan Royals to the title in the first edition of the IPL? If yes, going by that logic, Royal Challengers Bangalore's change in fortunes and run-up to the top spot last year probably had much to do with Kevin Pietersen making way for Anil Kumble. Chennai Super Kings' defeat against an out-of-sorts King's XI Punjab a few days ago made people blame MS Dhoni's absence for the beating. And ever since Kumar Sangakkara took charge, Punjab themselves don't have much to write back home about either.

People watch the IPL from different vantage points; among other things I look at the nuances in the leadership styles of the different captains.

Some think captaincy is the most overrated aspect in this format, while others believe it is what makes the difference in the end. For me, the captain is as good as his team, but I don't rule out the impact he can have on the final upshot. A captain may not be able to win with a very poor side, but he can always make a team punch above its weight.

Leadership by example
Some mistake this sort of captaincy with just performance on the field, but there's more to it. The captain's conduct is the easiest way to send a message across. If a captain is disciplined, like Rahul Dravid or Ricky Ponting, whose work ethics are immaculate, the team follows suit automatically. You'll see both Dravid and Ponting do fielding drills even after a long training session, when they can easily be avoided, and that's signal enough for others to go the extra yard. Perhaps the one-handed catch Dravid took against the Mumbai Indians last week wouldn't have been possible without those extra drills.

On the contrary, since Warne thinks that warming up before a match is not a very useful exercise, his team stayed away from it in the second edition of the IPL. While it worked for Warne, others found it difficult to do without, and perhaps the results reflected that.

One can also not discount the importance of an in-form captain. Once his game is taken care of, a captain can allow his focus to shift to other issues. Sangakkara must be feeling the heat at the moment.

Leadership by direction
Captains use this form of leadership to use on newcomers, who need to be given instructions, depending on the situation of the game and the player's role in the team. That's exactly what happened when I played for India: I was told about the role I was supposed to play in no uncertain terms and there was no room for negotiation. One may think this sort of thing may be a hindrance in the growth of a player but the exact opposite is true. It prepares a player to adapt to the different demands of the game and hence makes him a better player in the long run. You're taught right at the beginning to put the team ahead of yourself. If the need of the hour is to occupy the crease and build a partnership, you must put your head down and resist the temptation to be adventurous. Similarly, if you need to throw caution to the winds in the slog overs, you should not think twice about sacrificing your wicket.

Sachin Tendulkar is playing the mentor role to perfection with the Mumbai Indians. Saurabh Tiwary's hitting prowess was well known but Tendulkar has made him realise the importance of rotating strike; Tiwary is doing just that now and the results are for everyone to see. A few big shots may look impressive, but mixing caution with aggression and batting longer is what helps the team.

Leadership by seduction
This form of leadership works with players who've started to find their feet but still haven't made it. You dangle a carrot to get the best out of them. You set targets for them, and if they achieve them you reward them in return. For example, asking the Virat Kohlis and Robin Uthappas to be more consistent while batting at six or seven and rewarding them by promoting them up the batting order after a while. You do such things with people who you genuinely believe have talent and need some encouragement to fulfill their potential. It seems to be this method that Kumble is employing in the Royal Challengers side.

Leadership by association
Once a player is comfortable with his game and knows most of what needs to be done, the captain makes him a part of the decision-making process. They discuss strategies and make plans together. The captain asks the player for his opinion, and instead of giving orders makes suggestions. This is the sort of method Tendulkar is probably employing with Zaheer Khan at the moment: he has faith in Zaheer's ability and knows he doesn't need every last thing spelled out for him. So they form a partnership of sorts, where both give inputs and the captain gets things done.

Leadership by delegation
There comes a time when a player is so experienced, he doesn't need to be told, at all, what to do. He knows what works best for him and no amount of persuasion will make him think otherwise. To get the best from such a cricketer, the captain must respect his experience and allow him to do whatever he's comfortable with. If he's at his best batting a certain way or bowling to a certain field, the captain should allow that to happen as far as possible, as long as it's not ruining the team's chances of winning. In turn, the player acknowledges that freedom and rarely lets the captain or team down. The art here is to get someone to do something you want done because he wants to do it. This is probably the sort of leadership Kumble must be employing with Jacques Kallis at the moment. This season Kallis has been given the freedom to bat at his own pace (though obviously not too slow), while others around him complement his efforts by going after the bowling.

A captain must understand that good communication is the key. It is imperative for him to be available to every single player and be able to talk to them in language they understand. It becomes even more important while leading an IPL team because the players are from different parts of the world, with different temperaments and backgrounds. A captain needs to go the extra yard to understand what makes them tick and how to handle each of them.

As a player, if I know that my captain is going to stand by me, I'll happily stretch that extra bit. But if I'm not sure, like I personally wasn't with Brendon McCullum for Kolkata in the second season of the IPL, I'd hold myself back. Why would a player do anything for a captain who doesn't even remember his name? Pietersen apparently forgot the names of his Royal Challengers team-mates. No wonder things changed when Kumble took over.

You have to be one of the players yet maintain an aura that commands respect. A captain must create an environment in which a player feels secure of his place in the side, and let him express himself both on the ground and off it. A player should also know that his captain will support him to the hilt.

Sounds a lot of work, right? And we haven't even touched upon the skills required to make bowling changes, make and execute plans, and all the rest of it. A captain certainly has a lot on his plate.

I'm reminded of a beautiful quote by John Quincy Adams: "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader."

The next time you watch a captain walk away with the honours, spend a moment thinking of the ordeal he has gone through to get there.

Source


Greedy or good?

The IPL3 - marmite or jam? Grotesque and greedy 21st-century monster that thrives as unrelenting capitalism stutters all around, or cricket's chance to move into the future, secure its financial security and bring pleasure to people who have limited leisure time? As I lounge in a very unathletic pose on the sofa, cup of tea in hand, packet of mini-eggs nearby, and flick on ITV4's coverage, I find myself uneasy, despite the sometimes thrilling cricket, the fun, and the obvious enjoyment of the crowd. Why? Well here goes:

1 There is something about the millionaire franchise owners wearing dog tags, understated but expensive clothing and immaculate blowdries, watching over their many-dollared playthings with a proprietorial air that is slightly distasteful. It is all a bit Lord of the Manor watching his serfs plough the field, only with vast sums of money involved rather than sheaves of barley.

2 Why are the cheerleaders all white? Aren't there any Indian dancers? Surely they could dress in a culturally acceptable way if crop tops are not considered de rigeur. Or wouldn't they be Caucasian enough to attract the American market? Am I missing something obvious here?

3 I know I've not been following cricket with unfailing devotion over the last few years, but since when has a six, the most thrilling shot in the game, been known as a DLF Maximum? Why doesn't it stick in the commentators' throats? And just how much money does it take to lubricate that particular phrase?

4 And while we're at it, what has happened to the famously rich language of cricket - especially from English-speaking Indians with a well-deserved lyrical reputation? The literary associations, the thoughtful phrase, the letting the pictures do the talking? Sixes, sorry DLF maxs, are "100% out of here". Shots are appreciated with a theatrical grunt, moan or "Woooah". Does brutish cricket have to be appreciated in brutish language?

5 What's a strategy break? And why do you need one in a 20-over game the whole selling point of which is that it takes place at breakneck speed? Ah. Of course. It must be another chance for the lucky viewer to peruse a few more advertisements for his pleasure. Because there are just not enough exploding pop-ups appearing like monsters out of the screen when a wicket falls or at the end of an over. By the by, I'd like to know how many cars Mercedes think they are going to sell on the back of this. Just how many of the 400,000 ITV4 viewers have a spare £50,000 in their pocket?

And yet. And yet, it is not all bad.

This is the first free-to-air cricket to be shown on British television for five years. What a treat to be able to watch not only Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid but Shane Warne and Lasith Malinga and Dale Steyn and the odd English (or Irish) man and the young up and coming Indians without having to pay a subscription. ITV should be shouting it from the rooftops. I hope that cricket clubs the country over are sending out reminders to their colts to switch the telly on. Perhaps it can develop a niche following, as Italian football and American football at one time had on Channel Four.

For whatever the disputed wonder of Yusuf Pathan's speedy hundred the other day, skill still thrives. Anil Kumble's googly to Saurabh Tiwary on Saturday was gorgeous. Kallis has been playing beautifully. Some of the fielding has been astonishing - against the Mumbai Indians, Rahul Dravid took a fantastically athletic one-handed catch which finished with a head over heels.

Unless the television cameramen are being very careful with their camerawork, the grounds are full. The paying public look as if they are having a ball, the bands keep a constant stream of noise and the dancers do their business. The sun is shining, the game is anything but moribund. The players, too, seem to be having fun, and they obviously care - Tendulkar was waving his hands about and looking almost freaked as Bangalore crept effortlessly up on their target on Saturday. The huge amounts of money floating around obviously do not negate meaning.

The IPL is a huge sticky and sickly and delicious pudding that gives an instant sugar hit, and is a guilty pleasure. But the question is, will greed overtake us and will we stop in time?

Source


Chennai's bare fast-bowling cupboard

During the IPL auction this year, Chennai Super Kings wanted to buy a fast bowler but failed to pursue their targets with the single-minded determination necessary to land a big catch. After losing allrounder Kieron Pollard to Mumbai Indians during the silent tiebreaker, Chennai bid aggressively for Shane Bond but dropped out of the race once the price passed $600,000. They then pursued the West Indian quick Kemar Roach, bidding higher than they had for Bond, but let Deccan Chargers have him for $720,000. They did not chase Wayne Parnell.

The deficiency in the fast-bowling stocks as a result of those failed bids, especially after the injuries to Andrew Flintoff and Jacob Oram, has hurt Chennai's campaign severely. The franchise reportedly rated the best in the IPL in terms of brand value doesn't possess one of game's best match-winners - a genuine fast bowler.

Today, Chennai's attack was led by Albie Morkel. Bangalore's Dale Steyn spearheads the bowling for South Africa, Kolkata's Bond opens for New Zealand, Mumbai's Zaheer Khan leads India's attack, Delhi's Dirk Nannes and Rajasthan's Shaun Tait do the job for Australia, and Deccan's Chaminda Vaas was Sri Lanka's new-ball expert for years. Morkel, the tall South African, is usually first or second change for his national side.

Morkel has failed to make much of an impact with only four wickets in six matches. He's been given the new ball but has often finished a first spell without denting the opposition's batting order. His control has been good but that amounts to little without wickets, especially when there's not much firepower to come. It would be unfair to pin it on Morkel, though, for he isn't a natural strike bowler. Circumstances have made Chennai give him that responsibility.

Most of the other franchises have a support cast of international quality fast bowlers as well. Mumbai, for example, had Lasith Malinga, Dwayne Bravo, Pollard and Ryan McLaren. Chennai possess the gentle medium-pace of L Balaji and Joginder Sharma, both easy prey for batsmen intent on attack. They have Makhaya Ntini on the bench but his form in recent months has been poor and he hasn't got a game yet. There are no other reserves.

The Indian bowlers sharing the new ball with Morkel are Balaji, Sudeep Tyagi and Manpreet Gony. Balaji has the ability to produce variations that can take batsmen by surprise but his accuracy is poor. Tyagi is still raw and, despite an encouraging performance in Bangalore, is a work in progress. Despite spending time in the Indian dressing room over the last six months, Tyagi hasn't put those lessons into practice in the middle. Gony blows hot and cold.

MS Dhoni acknowledged bowling was an area of concern, with the tournament approaching the halfway stage and Chennai having lost four out of six games. "We are lacking confidence in the bowling department," Dhoni said after the defeat to Mumbai.

But he did not agree that a tearaway quick would solve his team's problems. "It is not just about pace. Because if that was the case, Shaun Tait would've been doing really well and Chaminda Vaas wouldn't have been taking wickets." Fair point, but he would love to have the option of a Tait to try and rattle the opposition openers.

Source


Wednesday, March 24, 2010

The return of the cheeky chappie

Like all countries of any age, England has endured its share of caricatures. Basil Fawlty, Captain Mainwaring, Richard the Lionheart, Robin Hood, Jonathan Ross, Beau Nash, George Formby, the Carry On films - it's a strange mixture of fact and fiction and all pointing towards an image that is at once an amusement and an aspiration.

Naturally it's the same in English cricket, for a game is in part an expression of a wider psyche. Was anyone surprised that the Germans prevailed in the semi-finals of the World Cup hockey? If not, why not? The response is informative and raises an issue many are reluctant to address: the notion that nations have cultures that are constantly but slowly evolving around an inner core. Of course, the same applies to families and schools and teams and companies and so forth.

Luckily England has a history calculated to inspire, and a cricketing tradition able to uplift. If the 1981 and 2005 series cannot instill ambition then the game is up. Over the years English cricket had had its share of archetypal characters. Most especially, it has unfurled the unyielding aristocrat, sent to cold boarding schools by parents serving overseas, the red-cheeked toff, the pragmatic professional, the betrayed working-class fast bowler, the nuggety opener, the wide boy from south of the river, the overwhelmed country lad, the canny northerner.

And they have played in the same team. Cricket's greatest triumph has been its ability to hold all sorts together. When other English games were torn apart by social considerations preventing working man and upper classes playing in the same team, cricket found ways and means of avoiding a split. Outsiders look askance at the different gates and dressing rooms and hotels and names and trains used by professionals and amateurs in the first half of the 20th century and conclude that cricket was the most class-ridden of all English sports. At best it is an oversimplification. Rugby, tennis, soccer, cycling and athletics divided along class lines. Cricket used various devices to remain intact - such as matches between Gentlemen and Players and so forth. A more interesting question is why that happened. Only the complacent will put it down entirely to love of the game. Shortages of bowlers might have had a part to play, and the fact that from the start the game was played in villages and public schools. It had a foot in both camps. That was not as true of rugby or soccer.

Of course, nowadays archetypes are not so easily outlined. Much can be told from the comedies shown on television and the novels appearing in bookshops. England has become a far more cosmopolitan society. Nationalists argue that the diversity is the very cause of the decline. Patriots suggest it is a deterioration, the inevitable result of the tiredness caused by social upheaval, world wars and a long period of high achievement and attendant pressure. Optimists like your correspondent are convinced that the fightback will be led by these new communities who arrive seeking opportunity and ready to roll up their sleeves. Already they are playing an enormous part on the cricket field. The question is not why imports like Chris Kieswetter and Jonathan Trott thrive; the issue is why Andrew Strauss and Matt Prior made the grade and not a hundred thousand other young cricketers from Hull to Highgate.

Nowadays it is true the team is more geographic than previously and seems to consist mostly of South Africans, Durhamites and sons of past players, a point that the more thoughtful of the English scribes are starting to address. Indeed, it seemed for a time that archetypes were a thing of the past as the team became ever broader. And then came Graeme Swann to brighten things up.

Actually he is more duck than swan. Inescapably he belongs to the great English tradition of the cheeky chappie. It is a revival that raises hopes of resurgence in the team and the country. Here is a young man of no particular brilliance prepared to mix it with brazen Australians and superb Indians. Here is a cricketer who fancies his chances, a player drawn by love, fuelled by audacity, driven by fighting spirit, sustained by ambition.

About the only surprise in his story is that he was born in Northampton, a Midlands city known mostly for its red bricks and shoes. It's as daft as David Gower turning out for Leicestershire not Kent. Recovering from this early setback, Swann has built a career founded as much on attitude as skill. Optimism has played a huge part in his rise. He plays cricket like a man eager for a scrap and not too bothered about the niceties. He bowls like a man expecting to take wickets and unaware that fingerspin had been consigned to the dustbin (at any rate unless it was backed up by a mystery ball or curious conveyance and bewildering progress). Swann had no such weapon at his disposal and still rose to the top. In some respects he resembles Ian Botham, another man unwilling to give the game second best.

In part, Swann has been lucky with his timing. After all, he is an offspinner in an age of left-handers. Not the least significant change in the game over the last few years has been the emergence of so many lefties, many of them stronger in the right hand. Before long coaches will be obliged to throw away the manuals and change their way of thinking. S Rajesh, Cricinfo's indefatigable statistician, recently revealed that Swann averages 22 against left-handers and 40 against the right-handed brigade. No wonder offies are popping up all over the place - even in Australia.

Nor has the change been limited to batting. Swann has also been helped by the number of left-arm speedsters running around. Towards the end of matches he is able to aim at the footmarks left by the operators, friendly and hostile, and can still expect to hit the wickets. Even the most accomplished batsmen have found themselves groping at him, trying to cover the ball turning back sharply from the rough, and thus vulnerable to the delivery that goes straight along. It's no accident that good bowlers take wickets with straight balls. Batsmen are set up.

But it has not merely been a matter of right place at the right time. Swann has dared to attack. For years English spinners, especially, were more inclined to defend. John Emburey was an expert practitioner who bowled stump to stump, keeping a tight line, probing away, returning tidy figures, waiting for a mistake. Ashley Giles tried to frustrate batsmen, once directing his attentions a foot outside Sachin Tendulkar's leg stump (and securing praise from the more craven commentators). In cricket parlance it is called a dry line. In reality it is dull cricket. Monty Panesar adopted the same strategy. In the end it has not been quite enough. Too many batsmen were willing to milk the orthodox spinners, too many hours passed between scalps.

Swann challenged these glum metrics and emerged triumphant. From the outset he sets out to take a wicket every ball. It's his nature. As much can be told from his batting, with its swashbuckling shots and refusal to regret. As a rule Swann sends the score surging along at a run a ball, and never mind that the team is in trouble or that it is a highly respectable five-day match. He takes brave decisions and then defies the game to do its worst. To him caution is defeat. Apart from anything else, he is bad at it.

Although a spinner, he is about as docile as a rottweiler. Much could be gleaned from his belated first over in Test cricket. Within six balls he had removed two batsmen. Nor were they mugs. His victims were Gautam Gambhir and Rahul Dravid. It was a remarkable contribution. Shane Warne himself could not have grabbed the ball with as little fear and as much impact. The Indians left the field with a bemused air. How on earth had they managed to miss apparently innocuous offbreaks? And twice in one fell swoop? Dravid's defence is supposed to be impenetrable. But these dismissals were not flukes. Swann landed each ball perfectly and beat superb opponents in the air and off the pitch. Of course he celebrated the dismissals, but he looked pleased, as opposed to surprised. As far as he was concerned it was a beginning not an end.

And those first two wickets pointed towards strength in his game. Swann can flight the ball. Again, he is a man of his times. As anyone following the careers of Daniel Vettori and Nathan Hauritz could confirm, flight is back in business. Ten years ago anyone prepared to toss the ball into the air was dismissed as a doomed romantic. Heavy bats, short boundaries and shorter matches had sent slow bowlers to the knacker's yard. Cricket had become a power game. Only freakish spinners could survive. Before that, pace was supposed to be the supreme ruler.

Perhaps it is cyclical. Somewhere along the way batsmen forgot about footwork and reading from the hand. Maybe, too, they forgot about stroking the ball into gaps or dropping it at their toes. Whatever the reason, batsmen became less confident against flighted deliveries. Swann and company have been able to exploit this weakness. Swann has beaten great batsmen like Ricky Ponting and Jacques Kallis, penetrating their defences, clean-bowling them or enticing an edge. And so the great mind falls to the unconsidered question.

Now Swann has risen to second in the rankings. It is an extraordinary achievement. Happily, too, he has remained the same chirpy fellow. At once he is a handful and a throwback. Above all, he is a fine cricketer and a distinctively English character, a wide boy, An Eastender in the blitz, ignoring the bombs and calling out the price of apples, with a little added for his back pocket.

Source


Siddharth Trivedi leads disciplined performance

He wasn't nearly as quick as Shaun Tait. He didn't engage in verbal jousts with batsmen or erupt after a wicket like Munaf Patel. He wasn't the Man of the Match. He didn't even have the best figures of the game but, as his captain Shane Warne acknowledged later, a "fantastic" Siddharth Trivedi delivered the goods when the ball was thrown to him. Trivedi's tight first spell revived Rajasthan Royals when Kings XI Punjab were cruising along smoothly and set in motion a dramatic collapse that leapfrogged Rajasthan to joint fourth on the points table.

Three nights ago it was Punjab who applied the squeeze on a lacklustre Chennai Super Kings, chipping away with wickets to force a Super Over and then taking the match in tense manner. Tonight, it was their turn to collapse, albeit against a tougher target, from a place of dominance. From a manic 76 for 1 after the Powerplay overs, Punjab lost nine wickets for 67 runs from the time a rampant Manvinder Bisla was dismissed by Warne in the eighth over.

Trivedi's contribution was outstanding. His role, coming in at second change, was not to hurl the ball down at pace but rather to rely on his variations. There was extra bounce on this surface and Trivedi did just that at the right time for success. His first spell came immediately after the Powerplay. At 76 for 1, Punjab had set down a platform, and Bisla was threatening to see them home. From the word go Trivedi settled down to bowl a tight line, using the offcutter and slower delivery to good effect. In his first over he set about the change in tone, conceding just four runs, one of which was a leg bye. Bisla twice tried to skip out and dictate terms, but failed both times. Ravi Bopara, keen to play the sheet anchor's role, had trouble spotting the slower ball.

Only five followed in his second over, during which he surprised Yuvraj Singh with a snorter. The use of the short delivery, particularly against the Indian batsmen, has been successful this season and Trivedi was well aware. In a chase where Punjab needed to score at 9.20 an over, Trivedi had given just nine runs in two overs, and the pressure led to a wicket. Bisla tried to break the shackles against Warne and picked out the fielder in the deep.

In his next over, the 11th, Trivedi again repeated the short delivery and got Yuvraj to miscue a pull out to deep square leg, where Michael Lumb put down a straightforward chance. There was hardly time for Rajasthan to react in despair, for two deliveries later Yuvraj misread a slower ball and skied to long-on.

Warne kept Trivedi's last over for later and brought him on for the penultimate over - after Tait bowled a superb 18th - with Punjab needing 43 from 12 balls. The game was Rajasthan's, but a loose over wasn't what they required. Trivedi capped his evening with Mahela Jayawardene's wicket, finishing with 2 for 25.

It is important to have wicket-taking options after your new-ball pair and Trivedi provides that. He certainly doesn't have the conventional fast bowler's build, but a sprightly leap as he nears the crease and a whippy arm action help him generate decent pace and good bounce. He's also fairly accurate, and an economy rate of 6.37 after three games is something that some of the established international stars can't boast of.

Trivedi really was a star tonight, bowling at crucial periods, but there were other contributors along the way. Munaf hadn't had the best of tournament so far - in fact he had yet to bowl a complete spell in any of his matches - but his wobbly medium-pace was ideally suited to conditions under lights. His second and third overs were painful, with Kumar Sangakkara and Bisla tearing into him, but when Warne tossed him the ball ahead of the 13th over, with Punjab 112 for 3, Munaf delivered. Until this time Munaf had appeared disgruntled, and keen to shoot off his mouth at the batsmen, but here he kept a cool head and shut his mouth to bowl a decisive over with two lovely slower deliveries producing wickets.

Tait's evening seemed headed for another poor outing when he had his first delivery put down by the wicketkeeper down the leg side, and soon after when Sangakkara took him for three boundaries in four balls. But Tait banged in a short ball and got the Punjab captain steering to third man. Later, when he was called back to bowl two overs at the death, Tait snuffed out the tail.

Punjab's run-chase stumbled as Warne fell back on his domestic players, and Trivedi and Munaf took pace off the ball in a manner that made them extremely effective in crunch situations. While the master tactician continues to disappoint with the ball, his apprentices are starting to find their feet in this season's competition. Warne was the first to admit that the manner in which his group responded was brilliant.

Much of the credit for this win must go to handy 60-run fourth-wicket partnership between Faiz Fazal and Adam Voges, which in the end was the difference between the two sides. When Rajasthan lost their third wicket wicket they were 111 in 13 overs; Punjab lost their third wicket at 107, after 11 overs. From there, the two innings shaped up differently: while Fazal and Voges lifted Rajasthan's middle order with a fifty partnership, Punjab's middle order fell apart in 23 deliveries. Voges, whose last and only two IPL innings have transformed the tone of the innings, was deservedly named Man of the Match.

In a team shorn of flashy players and big-hitting heavyweights, it was perhaps no surprise that Rajasthan's win was down to a good old-fashioned all-round effort.

Source