After the Ashes are done and dusted it is now time for the post-mortems and the reviews to follow. In this final installment of a two part series,
Srivathsa gives his take on the English side's performance over the last 5 matches.
Andrew Strauss - 474 runs at 52.66 in 9 inningsThe rock of Gibraltar at the top of the order for England, Strauss was the batsman that the Aussies loved to dismiss early on. He played with an assurance and exuded monk-like calmness at the crease. Setting the tone for a huge first innings score at Lord's with a measured innings of 161, Strauss was impeccable in his judgment of line and length and once he got in, it was a huge task to get him out. He has sorted out his technical shortcomings and emerged a stronger batsman. His importance was further underscored by the fact that when he failed in Headingley, England lost by an innings. As for his captaincy, Strauss' decisions- like giving Onions the first over at Edgbaston or his preference to allow Stuart Broad a go after lunch at the Oval- paid off handsomely. He never looked flustered or fazed by the situation and exuded a tremendous amount of confidence. Strauss also had the better of Ponting in the captaincy stakes. It can safely be said that he was a huge factor in England regaining the Ashes.
Verdict - Top class. Could not have done better, either with the bat or with the captaincy. He looks suited to lead England for many more yearsAlastair Cook - 222 runs at 24.66 in 9 inningsApart from his swashbuckling innings of 95 at Lord's, Cook did little of note in the remainder of the series. He was quite vulnerable to the moving ball and struggled when the ball was pitched up. Cook has a tendency of playing across his front pad and he sparred at deliveries outside the off-stump - which meant that he was dismissed LBW or caught in the slips cordon frequently. He was unable to concentrate for longer periods and as only 2 scores of more than fifty against the old enemy in 10 Ashes Tests testify, he has failed to live upto expectations. He remains a fine close catcher though, as he took some vital catches in the series.
Verdict - Poor. He can certainly play much better than the runs to his name would suggest. Needs to be on guard as some young opening talents are pressing for a spotIan Bell - 140 runs at 28 in 5 inningsThe 'Shermanator' as he has been named by Shane Warne, Ian Bell remains the biggest enigma of English cricket in recent years. He started off the series with a lucky fifty at Edgbaston after being called up to the side in place of an injured Pietersen. Then he promptly failed at Headingley, giving rise to further doubts about his temperament. He was pushed to number 3 at the OVal and after surviving a torrid spell from Johnson, he made a fine 72 to set up England's win. Bell likes to score heavily when someone else takes the initiative and still lacks the capability to take hold of the match by the scruff of the neck. He found it hard to negotiate the short pitched stuff from Johnson and at times looked flimsy and ill-equipped to handle serious pace.
Verdict - Average. Continues to disappoint and thrill in equal measure. Still has a long way to go to cement his position in the sidePaul Collingwood - 250 at 27.77 in 9 inningsThe battler in the English middle order, Collingwood played one of the best innings of his life when he gritted his way to a match-saving 74 at Cardiff. That innings should have been a harbinger of things to come, instead it led to a massive downward slide as he failed to make a mark in the remainder of the series. He lost his nerve for battle as he poked at balls - resulting in catches behind the wicket. Collingwood had trouble facing Hilfenhaus and his nemesis Stuart Clark returned at Headingley to further dent his morale. By the end of the series, he looked very shaky and was easy prey for the Aussies. His lack of runs played on his mind as he dropped a dolly of Mike Hussey at the Oval and was way short of his usually high fielding standards.
Verdict - Inconsistent. As age continues to catch up with him and with young batsmen breathing down his neck, he is under pressure to retain his positionJonathan Trott - 160 runs at 80 in 2 inningsHe was considered a risky choice for the Oval in his debut Test, but he made everyone eat humble pie with a solid century in the second innings. He played well in the first dig too, before he was unlucky to be run-out. He resembles a modern day 'Steve Waugh'- minus the Aussie's shortcomings against the short ball- as he plays much like the great battler used to. He never looked out of place or out of depth and rarely looked flustered. Trott grabbed his opportunity with both hands and made it count big time.
Verdict - Brilliant. A top class pick, if ever there was one. Could play for a long time if the English media does not go overboard about himAndrew Flintoff - 200 runs at 33.33 in 7 innings, 8 wickets at 52.12 in 7 inningsThe talisman of the English side, Flintoff came into the series with serious doubts about his knee. He somehow managed to play in 4 of the 5 matches and was a constant threat to the Aussies. He was irresistible at Lord's on the final morning as he tore through the Aussies with some of the best fast bowling seen in recent times. The knee injury kept him out of Headingley but he came back for a final hurrah at the Oval. Though he did not do much with either bat or ball, he produced the game-breaking moment of the match when he ran-out Ponting with a bullet like throw. That act was his final stamp on a mixed career as he ended it on a high. He produced a high quality innings of 74 at Edgbaston, but apart from that never shone with the bat. He never could touch the stratospheric heights of 2005, but the Flintoff of 2009, albeit on a pin-cushion of a knee was still a sight to behold. Flintoff had the crowd on the edge whenever he came out to bat or ran in to bowl. Nobody knows better than him how to milk the crowd as many Kodak poses would testify.
Verdict - Pretty good. When he was on song, he was too hot to handle. World cricket will surely miss super Fred. A true people's championMatt Prior - 261 at 32.62 in 9 innings, 11 catches and a stumping in 8 inningsPrior was selected on the basis that he was the best batsman among all the wicket-keepers in the country and he did no harm to that reputation by playing some crucial cameos at Lord's and Birmingham. His innings of 61 in the 2nd essay at Lord's was a momentum-changing one as he came in when the innings was crawling at a snail's pace. More than his batting, it was his keeping that caught everyone's eye as he conceded far less byes (44 compared to Haddin's 76 in the series). Kept superbly throughout the series and his quick silver stumping off North at the Oval topped off the summer for him. Prior's work with wicket-keeping coach Bruce French has paid rich dividends and he only can get better from here.
Verdict - Brilliant. Was one of the major performers for England and is now the undisputed number 1 keeperStuart Broad - 234 runs at 29.95 in 9 innings, 18 wickets at 30.22 in 8 inningsHe was quite anonymous with the ball in the first three matches as he looked out of depth and confused. He did not know whether he wanted to be a line and length bowler or a swing bowler as he continuously bowled without purpose. When the conditions did not favor him, he was listless and was in severe danger of losing his place at Headingley, yet he was picked and regained his mojo with a 6 wicket haul and then he produced arguably the spell of the series as he skittled Australia out for 160 to spark England's bid to regain the Ashes. As for his batting, he swatted the ball with gay abandon. His late order exploits helped England seize some crucial momentum. He was not willing to back down from a fight as well as he exchanged fiery words with Mitchell Johnson at Birmingham. As the series progressed, his confidence soared as well.
Verdict - An up and down series. Finished the series on a high and is expected to be the next Flintoff which could place a huge burden on himGraeme Swann - 249 runs at 35.57 in 8 innings, 14 wickets at 40.5 in 8 inningsSwann finished as the 4th highest run-getter for England in the series, which is a huge surprise to many, but not to him as he displayed rare determination to slam some crucial runs at the fag end of the innings. He batted far better than a number 9 batsman and attacked at every given opportunity with the willow. His innings of 62 at Leeds provided the Headingley crowd some cheer as England were heading towards a humiliating defeat. He courageously faced a barrage of short pitched stuff from Siddle at Cardiff and took some painstaking blows to his body enroute to a match saving innings of 31. He disappointed as a spinner in the 1st Test, but came into his own with a match winning haul of 8/158 at the Oval. On occasions he was guilty of bowling too flat and trying too hard in the final innings of a match- a case in point being the match at Edgbaston. The 'Joker' of the team, Swann continues to make waves.
Verdict - Very good. Finally bowled England to victory at the Oval after threatening to do so throughout. Continues to be the leading finger spinner in the countryJames Anderson - 99 runs at 16.5 in 8 innings, 12 wickets at 45.16 in 8 inningsWhen in full flow and when the conditions suit his swing bowling, Anderson is near unplayable as he proved at Lord's in the 1st innings. But when the pitch flattened out and the ball became old, he was guilty of not pitching it up - which is his biggest strength - and his mind drifted at times as well. He was way below his best at Headingley as he tweaked his hamstring while batting. Anderson was the spearhead of the attack and he fell some way short of fulfill that responsibility. With the bat, he was one half of the famous pair who rescued England at Cardiff with a last wicket rearguard effort, but he finally managed a duck in his 55th innings at Test level when he was trapped in front by Hilfenhaus at the Oval.
Verdict - Average. Fell short of the huge expectation placed on him as a spearhead, but still is the first name on the bowling front to be on the teamsheetSteve Harmison - 31 runs at 31 in 3 innings, 5 wickets at 33.40 in 3 inningsBig 'Harmy', as he is affectionately called by his team-mates, is the eternal enigma that no one has understood so far. After he bounced out Phil Hughes in a tour game at Worcester, he was expected to play at Cardiff, but the selectors thought otherwise and resisted picking him until Headingley even as he picked up loads of wickets for Durham in the county championship. Once unleashed at Headingley, he bowled some menacing spells coupled with some of the worst that he can conjure up. It left a further question mark over his place at the Oval, although his favourable record there helped him retain his spot. And the real Harmison stood up as he finished off the Aussie 2nd innings after lurking harmlessly all through the match. He did not get enough chances to show his tail-end skills with the bat.
Verdict - Neutral. Expect the unexpected from Steve Harmison and that holds true all the time. He might have played his last Test at the Oval as he considers retirement.Graham Onions - 19 runs at 9.5 in 4 innings, 10 wickets at 30.3 in 5 inningsThe perfect English seamer, Onions was the darling of the media for his tasty name. He bowled quite splendidly whenever he got a chance to play and was desperately unlucky to miss out at the Oval. Onions took 2 in 2 balls to start the slide at Edgbaston and never gave anything away by constantly attacking the stumps. Like Broad, he needs the conditions to help him just a bit and his main challenge will come when he is faced with sub-continental type wickets. He also was the subject of much media attention due to singer Lily Allen's perceived interest in him as she regularly asked on Twitter whether Onions was married.
Verdict - Good. He did well in the opportunities he got and has already booked his slot as the 3rd seamer in the sideRavinder Bopara - 105 at 15 in 7 inningsHe came to the Ashes series high on form and confidence after slamming three consecutive hundreds against the Windies. Then Shane Warne decided to do his bit for Australia by saying that Bopara is too cocky and does not have the temperament to succeed at Test level. That proved to be a masterstroke as he crumbled under the relentless swing bowling of Hilfenhaus. That comment by Warne looked to have been haunting him all through as he floundered for the first 4 matches before being dropped for the Oval Test. He could not sort out Hilfenhaus as he fell to him on 5 occasions. Bopara's technique seemed to take a beating as he fished at balls and also succumbed to the one that shaped back into him. After the Headingley Test, he went back and made a double hundred for Essex, but that failed to win him a place for the final Test.
Verdict - A huge disappointment. He remains a fine talent though, and with some runs at the domestic level, he could return with a bang. He will also be better off after the Ashes experienceKevin Pietersen - 153 at 38.25 in 4 inningsWhat can one say about a man who polarises opinion in England like no other. Pietersen came to the Ashes looking to further cement his status as an unbelievable talent, but left midway after hobbling out with an Achilles injury. Even when he played in those 2 Test matches he gave critics enough ammunition to corner him by playing one of the daftest shots in recent memory at Cardiff. He looked far from the world beating KP that everyone had become accustomed to as he struggled to find any semblance of form in the 2 games that he played. Even so, it speaks volumes about the man's aura that the Aussies were relieved when it was announced that he would not take part for the remainder of the Ashes series.
Verdict - Neutral. There is no doubt that he is England's premier batsman and few can dominate a match like he can. He is also a thorough professionalMonty Panesar - 11 runs in 2 innings, 1 wicket at 115 in one inningPanesar's contribution of 7* of 35 deliveries in the second dig at Cardiff was the single biggest factor in England regaining the Ashes- if Panesar had got out, the series would have been 2-2 after the Oval Test. No one expected Monty to hang on for so long, but he achieved the improbable. Even though he did not play any further part in the series it was enough for him to leave a lasting impact. His heroic effort at Cardiff should not mask the fact that he his bowling has plummetted to abysmal levels, which meant that when England had the option to pick 2 spinners at the Oval, their lack of confidence in him led to his omission.
Verdict - Poor with the ball but attained cult like status after his batting effort at Cardiff. He needs to improve drastically to reclaim his spinner's slot in the teamSource